A sql bug of having


I found a bug of druid sql about having. when i add having condition of “count(disticnt xxx)”. It will return . if i replace it for “count(xxx)”, it will return right result.

Anybody who knows whats wrong with it ?



Hey Jenny,

Do you have an example query that demonstrates the problem? If so could you please file it as an issue here: https://github.com/druid-io/druid/issues/new

ok,done. https://github.com/druid-io/druid/issues/4957

在 2017年10月13日星期五 UTC+8上午1:50:31,Gian Merlino写道: